Ecco le prestazioni di alcune CF su Alix.
– smi model no brand (blue)
root@nethsecurity:~ # cat /proc/ide/hda/model
SMI MODEL
root@nethsecurity:~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 956 MB in 2.00 seconds = 478.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 66 MB in 3.04 seconds = 21.71 MB/sec
root@nethsecurity:~ # dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/log/test bs=1M count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 145.565 seconds, 7.4 MB/s
– transcend 300x
root@nethsecurity:~ # cat /proc/ide/hda/model
TRANSCEND
root@nethsecurity:~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 920 MB in 2.00 seconds = 460.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 82 MB in 3.05 seconds = 26.89 MB/sec
root@nethsecurity:~ # dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/log/test bs=1M count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 58.7455 seconds, 18.3 MB/s
– transcend 266x
# cat /proc/ide/hda/model
TRANSCEND
root@nethsecurity:~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 920 MB in 2.00 seconds = 460.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 78 MB in 3.07 seconds = 25.41 MB/sec
root@nethsecurity:~ # dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/log/test bs=1M count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 58.1331 seconds, 18.5 MB/s
– transcend 133x
# cat /proc/ide/hda/model
TRANSCEND
root@nethsecurity:~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 916 MB in 2.00 seconds = 458.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 72 MB in 3.05 seconds = 23.61 MB/sec
root@nethsecurity:~ # dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/log/test bs=1M count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 105.822 seconds, 10.1 MB/s
La transcend 300x esegue il factory default in 2 minuti
La transcend 133x esegue il factory default in 3:45
La SMI in 3:45 circa
